Search didn't get harder. It split in two. Most SEO retainers are still optimizing for half of it, and still sending you a PDF nobody reads. This is an agent that audits both channels every week, hands you the fix already written, and ships it once you approve.
Not a dashboard. Not a monthly call where someone reads you a slide. An Agent that operates your SEO on a schedule and leaves a paper trail.
Every month it crawls the whole site, pulls Search Console and GA4, and runs nine audits in parallel: technical, on-page, content decay, internal linking, off-page, keyword gaps, local and AI search. Then it validates the numbers before it draws a conclusion, which is the step almost everyone skips.
A 43-prompt panel runs against Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT and Perplexity every month, sampled multiple times so a lucky hit doesn't count as a trend. You get a 0 to 100 AI visibility score, the prompts where competitors are being cited instead of you, and the exact page edits that close the gap.
Findings don't come as advice. Each one is a work item with the current text, the replacement text, the acceptance check and the reason, scoped so it can be shipped, not debated. Approve it and it goes live on staging with a rollback reference logged.
Once something has been put in front of you, no future report raises it again. Fixes get a measurement window instead of a repeat nag, and a no is honored. Every report ends with the list of what it deliberately didn't re-suggest.
The site was returning 403 to GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot and ClaudeBot. Its own robots.txt said to allow them.
The brand had been invisible to every major AI assistant for months. Nothing in the analytics showed it. No human had thought to check, because checking means fetching your own site as a bot and comparing it to what a browser sees.
High level: it reads everything, proposes a short list, and changes nothing until you say so.
We crawl the site, connect Search Console and GA4, and score your current AI visibility across three engines. You get a prioritized work order and a number to measure against. Most sites surface at least one live defect in this pass.
A scorecard, trend charts, and movers by page and query, with each move classified as a ranking change, a CTR change or a demand change, so you're not reacting to noise.
A full technical and content crawl on the 1st of every month. You receive the AI search audit the day after. Nine audit sections and per-page AI scores with paste-ready edits.
You approve the items you want. Each one is backed up, applied to staging, acceptance-checked, and logged with before, after and a rollback reference. Production stays a human decision.
Organic clicks were down 65.6% year over year. Leads were flat.
The blog had collapsed; the lead engine hadn't. Those are two different problems, and only one of them was worth money to fix.
103 money pages earned nothing at all.
Google was folding most of them into a single canonical. All 103 were money pages: two pairs at 97% and 99% duplicate content.
A sitewide lead-capture feature was loading its code from a dead domain.
A former contractor's server, connection refused, on 61 pages, sitting in the main navigation.
AI engines were stating two things about the brand that were factually wrong.
Both traced back to a single page. Both fixable in one edit.
The reason this is safe to run on a site that generates revenue.
The scheduled jobs run with every write capability revoked. They physically cannot edit a page, install a plugin, or publish. Reading and writing are separate jobs with separate permissions.
Every metric, delta, and comparison is computed in code from the raw API data. The agent interprets numbers it isn't allowed to calculate, which is why the numbers hold up.
Changes land on staging behind a hard environment check, backed up before the edit and logged with before, after, and a revision to roll back to. You push to production.
"Exit Engine's agent automated the audit and reporting, and spent the valuable time helping me to understand which were the right edits to my site. We rewrote 6 posts in 2 hours and saw clicks go from 113 weekly to over 600... in less than 3 weeks."
A service. We run the agent on your site and you approve the work. You're not getting a login and a learning curve. You're getting a weekly report, a short list of decisions, and the changes shipped.
Cadence and evidence. A retainer gives you a monthly call and recommendations. This gives you a report every Monday, a full technical and AI-search audit every month, and fixes that arrive written and ready to ship. And it doesn't re-pitch you the same issue quarter after quarter.
How often you get mentioned, cited, and recommended when someone asks an AI assistant a question your business should own. It's measured by running a fixed prompt panel against Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, and Perplexity every month and scoring the answers, so it's a number that moves, not a guess.
No. The scheduled jobs run with write access revoked and cannot change anything. Changes happen only on items you've approved, only on staging, behind an environment check, backed up first, with a rollback reference logged. Production is always a human push.
Read access to Search Console and GA4, a staging environment, and someone who can approve a short list once a week. The first baseline runs inside the first two weeks.
The reporting and AI-search work is platform-agnostic. It reads your site and your analytics. Automated implementation is wired for WordPress today; on other stacks you get the same work items, written to be shipped by your developer.
Start with the baseline. You'll know your AI visibility score, what's broken, and what's worth fixing first, before you commit to anything ongoing.
Book a strategy session